- "Nothingness" is a contradictory concept.
- "Self-containment" is an oxymoron.
- According to CTMU, is reality subjective or objective?
- According to CTMU, why are humans and other intelligent lifeforms of value to reality?
- Conspansive duality is false. Objects move through a background called "space".
- Ctmudatabase Wiki
- Does the CTMU rely on deduction or induction?
- Mind does not equal reality, since I can conceive of fictional things like fairies that don't exist.
- Multiverse theory explains the existence of our universe.
- Reality does not need a closed-form explanation.
- Reality doesn't need an explanation. It exists as a brute fact.
- Reality is not timeless.
- Reality is reducible to its parts.
- Russell's paradox and Godel's incompleteness theorem prove that the CTMU is invalid.
- Scientific paradoxes can only be scientifically resolved.
- Something can't come from nothing.
- Structure can be expressed without two valued logic (2VL).
- Tautologies are meaningless.
- The "fine-tuning" of our universe is explained by the Weak Anthropic Principle.
- The CTMU does not imply the existence of God.
- The CTMU makes no predictions. We can explain the universe without it.
- The CTMU relies on naive set theory, which is invalid.
- The universe can be explained with an infinite causal regress.
- The universe is expanding.
- The universe is only material.
- The universe isn't a set.
- The universe isn't cognitive.
- There is no empirical evidence for God, so there is no reason to believe one exists.
- Things don't have to be identical to their linguistic (cognitive) descriptions.
- Truth is not absolute.
- What are the CTMU's implications?
- What exactly is UBT?
- You can't define or ascribe attributes to "nothingness".
Advertisement
33
pages
Local Sitemap
Advertisement